Authors are free to discuss their paper with the media from six days before the publication date, and are asked to ensure that Nature Research's embargo conditions are understood by journalists and others. 25th Apr, 2017. The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. Decline publication, typically on grounds of either there being insufficient support for the conclusions or a reassessment of the level of interest or advance in light of the reviewers' comments. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. //--> Plants) (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the issues raised by the editor and peer reviewers, a response to each of the reviewers, replying to each of the points raised. Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the editors are convinced that the original decision was an error. Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. Like other journals in the Nature family, Nature Plants has no external editorial board involved in editorial decision-making. r/biology I buried a dead rat (killed by delayed rat poison or a neighbor's cat) in an iron barrel with soil on Sep 8. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. [CDATA[// > At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. Perform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if so, please provide sufficient explanation as to why you believe this to be the case in your response letter). Not sure what the right forum is for this. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. Content should reflect new discoveries or approaches, and should not overlap with publications presented elsewhere by the authors. Also you have to assume people have been off for the holiday. :-). Comments will be anonymous if the journal follows a single-anonymous or double-anonymous peer review model. PMID: 26364780 DOI: 10.1017/S0963180115000110 Abstract . Reject: This is an outright rejection decision, and in most cases, the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the author makes major revisions. and JavaScript. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. This will reduce delays. Most journals are configured to send two reminders before the offer expires. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. Submit your manuscript via the online submission and review system, eJournalPress, at
I think the manuscript "under consideration" is an auto-update that appears as soon as an editor has been assigned. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. ]]> Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. . If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. The login screen changed from "live manuscript" to "post decision manuscript" in a week, so I assumed it was desk rejected. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. Reviewers read the manuscript and submit their reports. Cactus Communications. [CDATA[> Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. The Journals and Editorial press office distributes embargoed mailings highlighting upcoming content to registered journalists six days in advance of publication. The login screen changed from live manuscript to post decision manuscript in a week, so I assumed it was desk rejected. GSA Bulletin: gsab@geosociety.org
Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. Maybe things are just taking longer due to Thanksgiving? Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. contracts here, report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. TIP: Do not make appeals personal attacks on the Editors or reviewers. News stories and other reporting about articles should not appear any earlier than the posting of the online paper. The authors will be sent the comments of the reviewers and Editor and asked to revise accordingly. Moreover, the results would be more instructive and easier to compare to previous results.. Incomplete data. All Rights Reserved. Clicking on the "Submissions being processed" link. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. Hello. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. Remember if your manuscript is sent for a second round of peer review the reviewers will see this letter too. It is Nov 28 and the status hasnt changed. [CDATA[// >
Watermelon Benefits For Female Fertility,
Is There A Red Light District In Miami?,
Oklahoma Basketball Transfer Portal,
Eastview Middle School Honor Roll,
Articles D